A Plea for Big Tent Benedictions

To all my friends in the clergy, and leaders of government and industry I have one simple question – why the need to specifically reference Jesus Christ in benedictions before large groups in diverse settings? I have attended numerous dinners and speeches during my professional career, and I continue to marvel at the lack of sensitivity by elected officials and civic leaders to what I see as a very simple issue of religious freedom.

A benediction (or whatever word you want to use) before a meal is an absolutely wonderful idea. The vast majority of us in the audience are incredibly grateful and acknowledge that some Higher Power has provided for us in ways we could not possibly do for ourselves.  What I don’t understand is why, typically at the end of an otherwise beautiful benediction, the speaker has to invoke the name of Jesus and throw in the collective “our Lord and Savior” as if it applies to everyone in the room. We may be one nation, under God, but a lot of us believe that God has many direct reports in this world. Why not use the “big tent” approach and recognize that at least a few members of your audience might be Jewish, Muslim, agnostic, or simply follow their own spiritual path?

Leaders of industry and politics have done plenty of proselytizing in their time.  And as long as it is from the heart, and something they feel they must do to proclaim their faith, I get it – I really do.  From my perspective, it just makes so much more sense for a leader to be inclusive and find the common ground, especially when speaking to hundreds or even thousands of people from a variety of backgrounds.  With the benediction you really have a captive audience and one that is hanging on every word in silence.  Why have them with you for a minute or two and then cut many of them out as you wrap it up with a very specific reference to Jesus? 

It may be an uphill battle to try to change this. I would simply point out to anyone willing to listen that there’s a positive, constructive way for us to share in a blessing as an entire community. And don’t get me wrong, if you are doing the blessing at the Evangelical prayer breakfast, feel free to rock that Psalm my preacher friend. But if you are saying grace at the opening of the Chamber of Commerce dinner, go ahead and get a little secular or at least inclusive of your neighbors. It really isn’t that hard to do.

I realize we can’t be perfect, and there will always be some fringe element who could quibble with even the most general prayer. It just doesn’t seem to be too much to ask to focus on God as a common thread for the vast majority of human beings on this planet. We could then have a moment of silence to allow individuals to offer up their own supplement to praise Jesus or just quietly reflect on the blessings in their life. Amen.

Standard

Organized Religion and the Search for Spirituality

I have been thinking a lot about the role of organized religion lately – both in my own life and for society in general.  Although I originally scribbled notes for this article in 2005, its roots go back to high school when I first realized I was a bit “different” than many of my fellow students at our Catholic high school.  I was never comfortable with the rote mechanics of Catholicism, and liked to challenge established concepts of God.  This led to a few extra demerits, but it started me on the path of questioning not only the Catholic practice but also Christianity itself.  A World Religions class and further study in college opened my mind to the possibility that Christianity didn’t have all the answers for all people.  And, more importantly, that many answers come from within ourselves. 

I came to believe that although organized religion is often the principal vehicle, the search for spirituality should be a uniquely personal journey.  Some of us need rote mechanics and recognizable symbols to feel connected with God. Others may use new-age techniques to transcend the corporeal. Most of us, of course, seek a connection with God through some combination of our participation in an established church — which gives us our sense of community and shared purpose — and personal spiritual development in our own customized way. 

I should have taken more courses in the field of religion, but the value of thinking and questioning stuck with me as I have continued the struggle for truth.  And I now believe I have come to a wonderful insight on the topic.  Namely, that Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, and the world’s other major religions all provide a perfectly legitimate channel for followers to connect with their creator or otherwise achieve spirituality, but none of them has an exclusive on the soul salvation market.

I believe we must drop the arrogant assumption — reinforced by generations of social conditioning throughout the world — that only our view could possibly be correct. The major religions, and I believe the vast majority of humans, share a common belief that a benign higher power created the universe and in some way continues to guide our path.  We don’t hear enough about these similarities, unfortunately.  And to make matters worse, followers often focus on the differences (even within their own tents) and have persecuted each other for most of recorded history as a result.  If only we could accept the fact that spiritual oneness with God (as you define Him) can be achieved through a multitude of means, no one of which is better or more effective than the other. 

This is my fundamental belief.  Jesus showed us one path. His teachings are pure and clearly establish a way to commune with God. I do not believe Christianity is the only way, however.  There were (and are still) others with the special ability to connect the masses with the ethereal concept of God.  I’m not a religious scholar, and will not force details into this piece.  I will just say what I believe, and what I think millions of others silently believe to be possible as well — that Jesus was an incredible human being who continues to show millions and millions of us a “Way” but not necessarily “The Way.”  I believe following closely the teachings of the Buddha, Mohammed, or other spiritual leaders can also lead a soul to salvation, enlightenment, or other satisfying end-game, and create a wonderful, meaningful life in the process.

Think about it for a moment. Is it more likely that hundreds of millions of people and their brilliant, dedicated, scholarly leaders are completely wrong, or that we all have it mostly right? I believe there is a God who watches over us and who has sent us multiple prophets to help guide us on the path to spiritual enlightenment.  Could you imagine what might happen if we all allowed ourselves to feel this way? Instead of focusing on differences and feeling threatened by one another, we would actually recognize the overwhelmingly powerful benefits of living a spiritual life on our own chosen path.  The “Us” vs. “Them” perception that continues to dominate our world would slowly recede and we may, just may, find some harmony in our shared humanity.

Idealistic?  You bet.  But can anyone doubt that the key to world peace lies in finding a solution to the problem of religious intolerance?  I find it tragic that so many followers believe that their way is the only way and that the rest of us are condemned souls.  This is the height of arrogance in my opinion.  Let us proclaim the mystery of faith….  No one will ever know for certain what happens to us mortals after death.  We can only believe.  And if you believe that your religion is the best way for you to achieve oneness with God, I applaud your faith and wish you well. If, on the other hand, you believe that your religion is the only way for me to accomplish this life goal, then we have a serious problem.  We should respect others who have a different belief and truly (not with lip service and hidden disdain) appreciate their chosen path as a very real avenue to their desired outcome in life, whether that term be “salvation,” “enlightenment,” or another state of being.  END

Standard